Lies? Thought Control? How else can you explain how so few people have so much control over what the “Westernized” people think and feel and do to support the Apartheid Entity, i.e. Israel?
Israeli Jews who are Zionists (people who believe in the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what was Palestine) have controlled the world’s media, partly through physical dominance of all forms of media, and partly through money, organization, effort, and discipline in conveying the message that Jews are Eternal Victims and, therefore, need governmental as well as societal protection. This Israeli Zionism has its tentacles reaching out to all corners of the world, dominating many countries’ leadership and ordered communities. This management also includes spies and fellow travelers at all levels in nearly all institutions.
Numbers of Jews, Zionist or otherwise, are few. Look at the figures.
Jews by Country. In the United States of America, there are slightly more than 5.7 million Jews, some 2% of the population in 2019. There are 450,000 in France (maybe 0.6% of the natives) and 292,000 in the U.K. (approximately 0.5% of the inhabitants). In Germany, there are about 118,000 Jews, roughly 0.1% of the 83.3 million making up the total population. In Israel, the heir of Nazidom, there are roughly 7 million Jews, about 46% of the total population. But U.S. President Biden. French President Macron, British Prime Minister Sunak, and German Chancellor Scholz, obedient to the Jewish will, all traveled to Israel to express support for an extremist “government” during its efforts to destroy Hamas, Israel’s only effective Palestinian opponent.
Democracy? Merriam-Webster defines that as being government by the people, especially rule of the majority.
How Is This Done? Mostly through the media and effective elites. The British newspaper, the Guardian ran a headline “A lot of pain’: Europe’s Jews fear rising antisemitism after Hamas attack”. The New York Times had an article: “The New German Anti-Semitism”. Bloomberg News carried a piece: “France Is on Edge After Israel-Hamas War Reopens Old Scars.
Are Jews “Eternal Victims”? ABC News thinks so. Here’s some of their reportage on the current Palestinian rebellion against 75 years of Zionist occupation: “…indiscriminately gunning down Israeli civilians and soldiers taken off guard. Other militants stormed beaches in Israel in motorboats and some brought death from the sky, swooping in on paragliders.” And D.C.’s Washington Post asserted “ Eighty-five-year-old Yocheved Lifshitz spoke of a “hell that we never knew before and never thought we would experience” as she described the harrowing Oct. 7 assault on her kibbutz [colony] by Hamas militants and the terror of being taken hostage into the Gaza Strip.” National Public Radio (NPR) claimed, quoting the U.S. Secretary of State, that “Hamas has only one agenda, to destroy Israel and to murder Jews," Secretary of State Antony Blinken told reporters Thursday at a press conference in Israel.” (NPR is, supposedly, an “independent, nonprofit media organization that was founded on a mission to create a more informed public.”)
How Does The Reality of Occupation and Repression Work? According to Philip Weiss, founder of Mondoweiss, an online news outlet, Jews control the U.S. media. He noted that he had worked at a variety of media organizations and said that most of his fellow journalists and supervisors were Jews who never failed to hide derogatory information about Israel. That might be vague to some but let’s look at how it’s done.
Here are excerpts from how the Palestinian-Israel war is reported, taken from Mondoweiss:
· As Israel struck Gaza in a massive bombing campaign, CNN today featured what appeared to be drone footage of Gaza City reduced to rubble, but the reporter on air was in Israel, Jeremy Diamond in Ashdod.
· MSNBC was little different. Josh Lederman was in Tel Aviv. Ali Velshi was in Ashkelon. So was Raf Sanchez.
· PBS News Hour last night featured both anchor Amna Nawaz and reporter Leila Molana-Allen — reporting from Tel Aviv.
· BBC was similar. Correspondent Nick Beake reported from Tel Aviv. While Jeremy Bowen was in southern Israel. Asked by an anchor about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, Bowen said, “It sounds like it’s absolutely dire.” But he said he was a few miles away.
· What is certain from the network coverage is that the numbers of network reporters in Israel are contributing to a profound bias on the part of the networks, a focus on Israeli victims in the fighting. CNN and MSNBC’s coverage has been unapologetically Israel-centric.
· And those network reporters have focused on the reports of Israeli children killed by Hamas militants, more than they have on the report by the Gaza Ministry of Health that Israel has killed 447 children in Gaza.
· But such reports would be far more compelling and factual if the reporters were inside Gaza. Right now the coverage feels like: Israelis are human beings, but Gazans are beneath human empathy.
As Mondoweiss editors wrote: “This is because U.S. networks are not in Gaza to tell the full story.”
Moreover, “thought control” means “job control”.
At least two journalists have been sacked from their jobs after expressing support for Palestinians since the latest outbreak of violence between Israel and Hamas.
Jackson Frank, a sports writer for Philadelphia local news outlet PhillyVoice, and Michael Eisen, editor-in-chief of life sciences academic journal eLife, have both been removed from their posts over remarks they have made regarding the conflict since fighting broke out on October 7.
Meanwhile, other reporters have been taken off air over their social media posts and one cartoonist had their contract with a British newspaper terminated after penning an illustration attacking Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu which many thought included an antisemitic trope. The removals follow several previous sackings at international news outlets.
On October 13, the satirical news site The Onion published a piece with the headline: "Dying Gazans Criticized For Not Using Last Words To Condemn Hamas."
Eisen, who is Jewish and has Israeli family members, responded to the piece posting on X, formerly Twitter: "The Onion speaks with more courage, insight and moral clarity than the leaders of every academic institution put together. I wish there were a The Onion university.”
Even sports has been co-opted to serve the Apartheid Entity. On October 8, the Philadelphia 76ers basketball team released a statement in which it said: "We stand with the people of Israel and join them in mourning the hundreds of innocent lives lost to terrorism at the hands of Hamas."
It came a day after around 1,500 Hamas and Islamic Jihad militants [sic] launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing civilians, including children and the elderly.
Frank has since continued to comment on the conflict, claiming Western media was a driving force behind the "acceptance of Zionism and Palestinian genocide," and that there was Palestinian "blood on the hands of so many politicians, organizations, journalists and media outlets."
Early last week, the BBC took six reporters for its Arabic news service off the air and launched an investigation over allegations of breaching the corporation's strict impartiality rules over claims some appeared to show support for Hamas on social media.
The British state broadcaster has previously faced criticism for its reporting on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and recently resisted pressure to refer to Hamas as "terrorists." One reporter, Noah Abrahams, told TalkTV he resigned from his role at the corporation over its refusal to do so.
Around the same time, The Guardian newspaper said it would not be renewing the contract of one of its longest-serving cartoonists, Steve Bell, after he complained on X about its decision not to run an illustration in which he depicted Netanyahu cutting a square of his stomach out with a scalpel in the shape of Gaza.
How Britain’s Israel Lobby Took Care of Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Candidate for Prime Minister
Even Universities Are Not Free From Biased Support for Israel. George Washington University (GW) is a school with many Jewish students, in downtown Washington, D.C. According to the New York Jewish newspaper Forward in 2022: “Hillel International estimates that 27% of the 11,000 undergraduates are Jewish, making GW the nation’s fourth-most Jewish private university.” Not surprisingly, the school is attempting to track down and severely punish the “anti-Semites” who projected vicious anti-Israel slogans on its buildings’ walls such as From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free. According to the Forward, the university stated “The projected slogans in no way reflect the views of the university...We are reviewing this incident and will take any appropriate steps with respect to the individuals involved in accordance with university policies.”
And that’s not just D.C.
Here's a report from WINS News, New York City:
Concerns over safety and security on college campuses in New York City continue to escalate as a digital billboard truck displaying names and pictures of students allegedly associated with pro-Palestine organizations popped up at Columbia University’s campus on Wednesday.
The ‘doxxing truck,’ as termed by students, displayed the names of students with a caption that branded them as “Columbia’s Leading Antisemites.” It was parked in front of Columbia University at a bus stop located at 116th and Broadway.
Doxxing is the act of publicly providing personally identifiable information about an individual or organization.
The truck is one example of a wider series happening at colleges across the country, where students are facing criticism and being blacklisted for sharing their political views. In this case, the students are being called out for signing a statement criticizing Israel for increasing its military actions in Gaza following Hamas’ terror attack on Oct. 7. and denouncing Israel's past attacks in the region.
Summation Points On Thought Control. It is quite unsettling to read the garbage pumped out about Palestine and Hamas. It is still more unsettling to live in a country that celebrates “freedom of speech”, yet denies it to selected groups based on what offends another, minority group that has extraordinary power.
I personally know Palestinian-Americans, both Christian and Muslim, who still have relatives in Gaza and what’s left of their original country. I cannot conceive of their heartbreak and outrage over how they are being painted by the Zionist Fanatics, who make Adolf’s Nazis seem like choirboys. OR, what they think of emigrating to the United States of America and being excluded from the brave words contained in the Preamble to its Constitution:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
OR their views on the invalidity, to them, of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And the Congress of the U.S.? According to the Huffington Post:
Ryan Zinke
Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.) introduced legislation on Thursday [Nov. 2] to ban Palestinians from the United States in an echo of former President Donald Trump’s infamous “Muslim ban.”
The bill would pause visas for Palestinians and go a step further by revoking any visas issued since Oct. 1.
Zinke claimed the policy would protect Americans from the threat of Palestinian terrorists abusing the immigration system in the wake of the Hamas attack on Israel last month and Israel’s invasion of Gaza.
“I don’t trust the Biden Administration any more than I do the Palestinian Authority to screen who is allowed to come into the United States,” Zinke said in a release. “This is the most anti-Hamas immigration legislation I have seen and it’s well deserved.”
Though the legislation specifically targets Palestinians who obtained visas in the last month, the title of Zinke’s press release makes his broader sentiment clear: “Zinke Introduces Bill to Expel Palestinians from the United States.” The summary says the measure would direct the Department of Homeland Security to “identify and remove covered aliens without lawful status,” including those whose lawful status was just revoked.
Final Thoughts. Quoting a contact’s remarks about that person’s father, Philip Weiss wrote several years ago:
He was fixated on the Holocaust, suicide bombers, and anti-Israel bluster from Hamas/Ahmadinejad. I think he’s typical of many Americans. He doesn’t follow I/P [Israel/Palestine] news regularly, but he knows the basics because he digests enough news. His sense of the history is flawed too: to him, Israel was a haven for Holocaust victims. He knows nothing about the expulsion of the Arab population. In his mind, he’s on the side of the good guys, and emotional inertia closes his mind to an alternate view and keeps him there.
Too right.
And, more recently Weiss commented: “A basic rule of journalism is that you cannot trust anything the Israeli government says in situations like this [war against Palestinians] without independent verification. Reprinting this without any verification is not journalism, it's stenography [the practice of concealing messages or information within other nonsecret text or data] for an apartheid government."
Too right, again.
When I spoke to a knowledgeable journalist just the other night, I was told that many people believe that it’s the next generation that will see the light about terrorist, illegitimate “Israel” and put an end to that apartheid entity. And they never do.
In long distance communication with an African journalist about the same subject, that individual asserted that people under 24 don’t read the “legacy” media and get their news from alternative sites. Therefore, Israel’s Hasbara doesn’t’ work with them and they will, eventually, effect change. My retort was that those under 24 have no political power and that it will be many years before they do.
Things will not get better due to Zionist Thought Control. They will only get worse. Just glance at Dr. Jack Shaheen’s book: Reel Bad Arabs, about how Arabs and Muslims are portrayed in America’s media.
Therefore, my only choice:
I stand with Hamas, not terrorist Israel.
Hamas Flag
J. Michael Springmann is an attorney, author, political commentator, and former diplomat, with postings to Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia. He previously authored, Visas for Al Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World: An Insider’s View, recounting how the U.S. created and used Islamic Terrorism. Additionally, he penned Goodbye, Europe? Hello, Chaos? Merkel’s Migrant Bomb, an analysis of the alien wave sweeping the Continent. He currently practices law in the Washington D.C. Area. He is a frequent commentator on Arab, Iranian, and Russian news programs.
Blacklisted by US news media, he is also on the Ukraine’s “Enemies List”, having questioned, inter alia, the country’s refusal to honor the Minsk Accords and for stating that its government is Nazified.