U. S. CORRUPT COURTS: SIDING WITH PALESTINE CRACKDOWN
REPRESSIVE AMERICAN JUDICIARY TAKE ITS ORDERS FROM ISRAHELL
Truly Astonishing. Yet it’s not. According to the Washington Post (May 8, 2024), more than12 federal judges will not hire Columbia University graduates as prestigious law clerks. Why? They don’t like pro-Palestinian protests.
The jurists sent a letter to Nemat Shafik, bungling, biased president of Columbia and Gillian Lester, dean of its law school. In it, they asserted that the schools are now the center of an “explosion of…antisemitism, and hatred of diverse viewpoints..” Continuing, they noted that Columbia has become “an incubator of bigotry.”
The racist simpletons’ names are:
· Elizabeth L. Branch, Judge; U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
· James C. Ho, Judge; U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
· Matthew H. Solomson, Judge; U.S. Court of Federal Claims
· Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, U.S. District Judge; Northern District of Texas
· Alan Albright, U.S. District Judge; Northern District of Texas
· David Counts, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Texas
· James W. Hendrix, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Texas
· Jeremy D. Kernodle, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas
· Tilman E. Self III, U.S. District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia
· Brantley Starr, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
· Drew B. Tipton, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Texas
· Daniel M. Traynor, U.S. District Juge for the District of North Dakota
· Stephen Alexander Vaden, Judge; U.S. Court of Claims
Pegging their screed to Hamas’ October 7, 2023 breakout retaliation against decades of Zionist oppression, the judges went on to dictate: “Universities should also identify students who engage in such conduct [demonstrations, protests, sit-ins] so that future employers can avoid hiring them. If not, employers are forced to assume the risk that anyone they hire from Columbia may be one of these disruptive and hateful students.” Is this not a repressive, undemocratic statement by people pledged to uphold the law? They want to attack anyone who disagrees with them and Zionism.
Too bad these jurists can’t handle freedom of speech. Of course they allude to it in an astonishing manner: “Freedom of speech protects protest, not trespass, and certainly not acts or threats of violence or terrorism.” Where was the violence and terrorism, other than by the police at the invitation of Nemat Shafik?
Continuing, they noted: “Recent events demonstrate that ideological homogeneity throughout the entire institution of Columbia has destroyed its ability to train future leaders of a pluralistic and intellectually diverse country. Both professors and administrators are on the front lines of the campus disruptions, encouraging the virulent spread of antisemitism and bigotry. Significant and dramatic change in the composition of its faculty and administration is required to restore confidence in Columbia.” Too homogeneous? Too much support from the professors? Too much antisemitism?
The bigotry comes from the overly-protected Zionists who are attacking the very basics of the United States—and have enlisted the support of the supposedly-neutral court system in doing so.
These wretched people conclude their demands by stating: “The objective of our boycott is different—it is not to hamper academic freedom, but to restore it at Columbia University.”
COMMENT. The reader can see the extent and power of the Zionist Jews. Not only do they own the corrupt, incompetent, illegitimate, and racist Congress as well as the Islamophobic, anti-Arab Executive Branch, but they also now control the Judicial Branch of the federal government.
The blithering idiots didn’t focus on police brutality, evident all over the country. No, they zeroed in on the pet dislikes of the Jews: “antisemitism”, “bigotry”, and “lack of diversity”. And then sought to block the hiring of particular students who disagreed with the “Semites”.
If Congress were a free, independent body, it would impeach and remove from office these self-proclaimed jurists for violating the Constitution and Bill of Rights. After all, they had sworn an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United Staes against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The Jews are both.
J. Michael Springmann is an attorney, author, political commentator, and former diplomat, with postings to Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia. He previously authored, Visas for Al Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World: An Insider’s View, recounting how the U.S. created and used Islamic Terrorism. Additionally, he penned Goodbye, Europe? Hello, Chaos? Merkel’s Migrant Bomb, an analysis of the alien wave sweeping the Continent. He currently practices law in the Washington D.C. Area. Internationally recognized as a knowledgeable pundit, he is a frequent commentator on Arab, Iranian, and Russian news programs.
Blacklisted by the US news media, he is also on the Ukraine’s “Enemies List”, having questioned, inter alia, that country’s refusal to honor the Minsk Accords and for stating that its government is Nazified.